"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/16/2015 at 22:58 • Filed to: None | 8 | 11 |
I got out of my car in my pajamas to take these pictures.
Jedidiah
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/16/2015 at 23:03 | 2 |
Tonka truck yellow — as it should be.
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/16/2015 at 23:04 | 4 |
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/16/2015 at 23:07 | 1 |
Your sacrifice was not in vain
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> HammerheadFistpunch
04/16/2015 at 23:08 | 0 |
Thank you.
boxrocket
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/16/2015 at 23:28 | 1 |
I saw a similar Defender 90 at QuikTrip yesterday, but I was too far away to get a decent shot, even with my Lumia.
R Saldana [|Oo|======|oO|] - BTC/ETH/LTC Prophet
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/17/2015 at 00:32 | 1 |
\not sure i can fap to this but im gonna motherfucking try.jpeg
Cé hé sin
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/17/2015 at 04:49 | 0 |
Top tip: if it's really a Defender, it's illegal in the USA. The name was introduced less than 25 years ago.
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> Cé hé sin
04/17/2015 at 06:53 | 0 |
Except if its one of the NAS Defenders sold in the US in between 93 and 97.
Cé hé sin
> TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
04/17/2015 at 06:56 | 0 |
Oh, I thought they had been dropped from the US market before that.
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> Cé hé sin
04/17/2015 at 07:15 | 0 |
They were sold in limited amounts during those years, only 500 110's an 2000(?) 90's. Soon D90/110's will be 25 years old... Soon...
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Cé hé sin
04/17/2015 at 08:02 | 0 |
A handful were legally sold here.